Results for the UK general election on 6 May 2010 Great Britain - Elections contested by Christian Party, Proclaiming Christ's Lordship
| Constituency | Candidate | Electorate | Turnout | Votes | Vote share | Vote change | Position |
| Blackley and Broughton | ZAMAN, Shafiq-Uz | 69,489 | 49.2% | 161 | 0.5% | - | 7th |
| Aberconwy | WYNNE-JONES, Edith | 44,593 | 67.2% | 137 | 0.5% | - | 6th |
| Hackney South and Shoreditch | WILLIAMS, John | 72,841 | 58.8% | 434 | 1.0% | - | 7th |
| Enfield North | WILLIAMS, Anthony | 66,261 | 67.1% | 161 | 0.4% | - | 7th |
| Croydon North | WILLIAMS, Novlette | 85,216 | 60.6% | 586 | 1.1% | - | 6th |
| Brent Central | WILLIAMS, Errol | 74,046 | 61.2% | 488 | 1.1% | - | 5th |
| Northampton North | WEBB, Timothy | 61,850 | 65.1% | 98 | 0.2% | - | 8th |
| Pontypridd | WATSON, Donald | 58,205 | 63.0% | 365 | 1.0% | - | 7th |
| Dagenham and Rainham | WATSON, Paula | 69,764 | 63.4% | 305 | 0.7% | - | 7th |
| Gateshead | WALTON, David | 66,492 | 57.5% | 131 | 0.3% | - | 8th |
| Cardiff North | THOMSON, Derek | 65,553 | 72.7% | 300 | 0.6% | - | 7th |
| Stockton South | STRIKE, Ted | 73,840 | 68.1% | 302 | 0.6% | - | 7th |
| Chatham and Aylesford | SMITH, Maureen | 67,964 | 64.5% | 109 | 0.2% | - | 8th |
| Maidstone and The Weald | SIMMONDS, Heidi | 71,041 | 68.9% | 131 | 0.3% | - | 7th |
| Walsall North | SHAKIR, Babar | 64,034 | 56.5% | 144 | 0.4% | - | 7th |
| Hayes and Harlington | SHAHZAD, Anell | 70,231 | 60.7% | 83 | 0.2% | - | 8th |
| Chippenham | SEXTON, Richard | 72,106 | 72.6% | 118 | 0.2% | - | 8th |
| Nottingham East | SARDAR, Parvaiz | 58,705 | 56.4% | 125 | 0.4% | - | 6th |
| Tooting | PAUL, Shereen | 73,840 | 68.6% | 171 | 0.3% | - | 7th |
| Ynys Môn | OWEN, David | 50,075 | 68.8% | 163 | 0.5% | - | 7th |
| Hornchurch and Upminster | OLUKOTUN, Johnson | 78,547 | 68.0% | 281 | 0.5% | - | 8th |
| Oldham East and Saddleworth | NAZIR, Gulzar | 72,557 | 61.4% | 212 | 0.5% | - | 6th |
| Edmonton | MORRISON, Clive | 63,904 | 63.2% | 350 | 0.9% | - | 7th |
| Pendle | MASIH, Richard | 66,422 | 67.8% | 141 | 0.3% | - | 6th |
| Wimbledon | MARTIN, David | 65,723 | 72.1% | 235 | 0.5% | - | 6th |
| Vauxhall | MARTIN, Lana | 74,811 | 57.7% | 200 | 0.5% | - | 6th |
| Walthamstow | MALL, Ashar | 64,625 | 63.4% | 248 | 0.6% | - | 7th |
| Streatham | MACHARIA, Geoffrey | 74,532 | 62.8% | 237 | 0.5% | - | 5th |
| Horsham | LYON, Steve | 77,564 | 72.0% | 469 | 0.8% | - | 6th |
| Ealing North | LJUBISIC, Petar | 73,104 | 65.2% | 415 | 0.9% | - | 7th |
| Birmingham, Selly Oak | LEEDS, Samuel | 74,805 | 62.2% | 159 | 0.3% | - | 7th |
| South Swindon | KIRK, Alastair | 72,619 | 64.9% | 176 | 0.4% | - | 6th |
| Walsall South | KHAN, Gulzaman | 64,387 | 63.5% | 482 | 1.2% | - | 5th |
| Tottenham | KADARA, Abimbola | 68,834 | 59.1% | 262 | 0.6% | - | 8th |
| Filton and Bradley Stoke | JOHNSON, Marion | 69,003 | 70.0% | 199 | 0.4% | - | 7th |
| Stretford and Urmston | JACOB, Samuel | 70,991 | 63.3% | 178 | 0.4% | - | 6th |
| Norwich North | HOLLAND, Andrew | 64,814 | 65.7% | 118 | 0.3% | - | 8th |
| Birmingham, Perry Barr | HEY-SMITH, Deborah | 71,304 | 59.0% | 507 | 1.2% | - | 6th |
| Buckingham | HEWS, David | 74,989 | 64.5% | 369 | 0.8% | - | 9th |
| Bath | HEWETT, Steve | 66,686 | 70.6% | 250 | 0.5% | - | 6th |
| Leigh | HESSELL, Ryan | 75,903 | 58.4% | 137 | 0.3% | - | 8th |
| Vale of Glamorgan | HARROLD, John | 70,211 | 69.3% | 236 | 0.5% | - | 7th |
| Manchester, Gorton | HARRISON, Peter | 75,933 | 50.5% | 254 | 0.7% | - | 7th |
| Hackney North and Stoke Newington | HARGREAVES, Maxine | 73,906 | 62.9% | 299 | 0.6% | - | 5th |
| Barking | HARGREAVES, George | 73,868 | 61.4% | 482 | 1.1% | - | 6th |
| Clwyd West | GRIFFITHS, David | 57,913 | 65.8% | 239 | 0.6% | - | 6th |
| Sheffield, Hallam | GREEN, Ray | 68,798 | 74.3% | 250 | 0.5% | - | 8th |
| Brecon and Radnorshire | GREEN, Jeffrey | 53,589 | 72.5% | 222 | 0.6% | - | 7th |
| Birmingham, Erdington | GRAY, Timothy | 66,405 | 53.5% | 217 | 0.6% | - | 8th |
| Aldridge-Brownhills | GRAY, Susan | 58,909 | 65.6% | 394 | 1.0% | - | 5th |
| Croydon Central | GITAU, James | 76,349 | 65.1% | 264 | 0.5% | - | 8th |
| Wansbeck | FLYNN, Michael | 61,782 | 61.9% | 142 | 0.4% | - | 8th |
| Birmingham, Edgbaston | FERNANDO, Charith | 68,573 | 60.6% | 127 | 0.3% | - | 8th |
| Ealing Central and Acton | FERNANDES, Suzanne | 70,251 | 67.2% | 295 | 0.6% | - | 6th |
| Westminster North | FAJARDO, Gabriela | 66,739 | 59.3% | 98 | 0.2% | - | 9th |
| Tamworth | DETHERIDGE, Charlene | 71,962 | 64.5% | 235 | 0.5% | - | 5th |
| Worthing West | DEARSLEY, Stuart | 75,945 | 64.7% | 300 | 0.6% | - | 6th |
| Ipswich | CHRISTOFI, Kim | 75,770 | 62.0% | 149 | 0.3% | - | 7th |
| Slough | CHAUDHARY, Sunil | 77,473 | 61.6% | 495 | 1.0% | - | 6th |
| Aldershot | BRIMICOMBE, Juliana | 71,465 | 63.5% | 231 | 0.5% | - | 6th |
| Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey | BOYD, Donald | 72,528 | 64.9% | 835 | 1.8% | - | 5th |
| Leyton and Wanstead | BHATTI, S. K. | 63,541 | 63.2% | 342 | 0.9% | - | 7th |
| Brentford and Isleworth | BHATTI, Aamir | 83,546 | 64.4% | 210 | 0.4% | - | 8th |
| Redditch | BEVERLEY, Scott | 66,573 | 66.1% | 101 | 0.2% | - | 8th |
| Cardiff South and Penarth | BATE, Clive | 73,707 | 60.2% | 285 | 0.6% | - | 8th |
| Thurrock | ARABA, Arinola | 77,758 | 58.9% | 266 | 0.6% | - | 6th |
| Ealing, Southall | ANIL, Mehboob | 66,970 | 63.8% | 503 | 1.2% | - | 5th |
| Preston | AMBROZE, George | 61,187 | 53.1% | 272 | 0.8% | - | 5th |
| Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner | AKHTAR, Ruby | 70,873 | 70.8% | 198 | 0.4% | - | 7th |
| Greenwich and Woolwich | ADELEYE, Edward | 65,489 | 62.9% | 443 | 1.1% | - | 6th |
| Harlow | ADEEKO, Olluyemi | 67,583 | 64.9% | 101 | 0.2% | - | 6th |
Turnout as calculated by the House of Commons Library, is the total number of votes cast and not spoiled, divided by the size of the electorate.
Under section 13(b) of the Representation of the People Act 1985, a candidate gaining 5% or less of the vote share will forfeit their deposit.
This was the first election on a new set of constituency boundaries in England, Northern Ireland and Wales. The vote share calculations in those countries are based on notional results, which estimate the outcome of the previous election had it been contested on the new boundaries.